<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Flock of Cats &#187; benchmarking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.flockofcats.com/tag/benchmarking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.flockofcats.com</link>
	<description>Politics, Video Games, Japan, Random Stuff, Etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 17:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New Computer Benchmarks</title>
		<link>http://www.flockofcats.com/sneaky/video-games/new-computer-benchmarks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flockofcats.com/sneaky/video-games/new-computer-benchmarks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:05:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sneaky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[computer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sneaky's New Computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flockofcats.com/?p=561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple weeks ago I benchmarked my old computer, and today, I ran the same benchmarks on the new computer.
Here&#8217;s how they compared:
 








 
Old Computer
New Computer


 
AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (1.8 GHz)
Intel i7 920 (2.66 GHz)


 
2 GB RAM
6 GB RAM


 
Old SATA Drive 80 GB
VelociRaptor 300 GB


 
Asus A8V Deluxe
evga x58 SLI


 
Radeon x850 
BFG gtx 260 (OC)


7z
 
 


Compressing 314 MB file
5 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple weeks ago I <a href="http://www.flockofcats.com/sneaky/video-games/benchmarking-the-old-computer/">benchmarked my old computer</a>, and today, I ran the same benchmarks on the new computer.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how they compared:</p>
<p> </p>
<table border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" width="539">
<col width="137"></col>
<col span="2" width="201"></col>
<tbody></tbody>
<tbody></tbody>
<tbody></tbody>
<tbody>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl24" width="137" height="17"> </td>
<td class="xl25" width="201"><strong>Old Computer</strong></td>
<td class="xl26" width="201"><strong>New Computer</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="17"> </td>
<td class="xl28">AMD Athlon 64 3000+ (1.8 GHz)</td>
<td class="xl29">Intel i7 920 (2.66 GHz)</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="17"> </td>
<td class="xl28">2 GB RAM</td>
<td class="xl29">6 GB RAM</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="17"> </td>
<td class="xl28">Old SATA Drive 80 GB</td>
<td class="xl29">VelociRaptor 300 GB</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="17"> </td>
<td class="xl28">Asus A8V Deluxe</td>
<td class="xl29">evga x58 SLI</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl30" width="137" height="17"> </td>
<td class="xl31">Radeon x850<span> </span></td>
<td class="xl32">BFG gtx 260 (OC)</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl33" width="137" height="17"><strong>7z</strong></td>
<td class="xl34"> </td>
<td class="xl35"> </td>
</tr>
<tr height="51">
<td class="xl30" width="137" height="51">Compressing 314 MB file</td>
<td class="xl36">5 min 40 s</td>
<td class="xl37">1 min 56 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl33" width="137" height="17"><strong>Boot Times</strong></td>
<td class="xl34"> </td>
<td class="xl35"> </td>
</tr>
<tr height="51">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="51">Power &#8211;&gt; Loading Windows<span> </span></td>
<td class="xl38">39 s</td>
<td class="xl39">35 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="34">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="34">Loading Windows</td>
<td class="xl38">29 s</td>
<td class="xl39">31 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="51">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="51">LoadingStartup Programs<span> </span></td>
<td class="xl38">56 s</td>
<td class="xl39">20 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl30" width="137" height="17">Total</td>
<td class="xl36">124 s</td>
<td class="xl37">86 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl33" width="137" height="17"><strong>Gimp</strong></td>
<td class="xl34"> </td>
<td class="xl35"> </td>
</tr>
<tr height="68">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="68">1920 x 1200 Gaussian Blur</td>
<td class="xl38">7 s</td>
<td class="xl39">3 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="51">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="51">Scale to 7680 x 4800<span> </span></td>
<td class="xl38">33 s</td>
<td class="xl39">16 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="68">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="68">7680 x 4800 Gaussian Blur</td>
<td class="xl38">45 s</td>
<td class="xl39">16s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="85">
<td class="xl30" width="137" height="85">2 copies 7680 x 4800 Gaussian Blur</td>
<td class="xl36">90 s</td>
<td class="xl37">21 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl33" width="137" height="17"><strong>Firefox</strong></td>
<td class="xl34"> </td>
<td class="xl35"> </td>
</tr>
<tr height="34">
<td class="xl30" width="137" height="34">Initial Loading</td>
<td class="xl36">13 s</td>
<td class="xl37">4 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl33" width="137" height="17"><strong>iTunes</strong></td>
<td class="xl34"> </td>
<td class="xl35"> </td>
</tr>
<tr height="34">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="34">Initial Loading</td>
<td class="xl38">30 s</td>
<td class="xl39">7 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="17">Rip CD</td>
<td class="xl38">4 min 10 s</td>
<td class="xl39">2 min 8 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="51">
<td class="xl30" width="137" height="51">Rip CD + Playing Portal</td>
<td class="xl36">7 min 40 s</td>
<td class="xl37">2 min 11 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="34">
<td class="xl33" width="137" height="34"><strong>File Copy</strong></td>
<td class="xl34"> </td>
<td class="xl35"> </td>
</tr>
<tr height="85">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="85">2.54GB storage disk to system disk</td>
<td class="xl38">2 min 10 s</td>
<td class="xl39">40 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="85">
<td class="xl30" width="137" height="85">2.54 GB system disk to system disk</td>
<td class="xl36">3 min 20 s</td>
<td class="xl37">55 s</td>
</tr>
<tr height="34">
<td class="xl33" width="137" height="34"><strong>3Dmarks05</strong></td>
<td class="xl34">4474</td>
<td class="xl35">n/a</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl30" width="137" height="17">CPU</td>
<td class="xl36">1001</td>
<td class="xl37"> </td>
</tr>
<tr height="34">
<td class="xl33" width="137" height="34"><strong>3Dmarks Vantage</strong></td>
<td class="xl34">n/a</td>
<td class="xl35">11573</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl27" width="137" height="17">CPU</td>
<td class="xl38"> </td>
<td class="xl39">38468</td>
</tr>
<tr height="17">
<td class="xl30" width="137" height="17">GPU</td>
<td class="xl36"> </td>
<td class="xl37">9385</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>As you can see, the new computer did a lot better in pretty much everything.  The benefits of having multiple cores can be seen in the CD rip + Portal test and in processing multiple images with The GIMP.</p>
<p>The 3Dmark test aren&#8217;t comparable since Vantage won&#8217;t run on the old system, but needless to say the graphics are much better.  Portal can be played at 1920 x 1200 at fully maxed settings and not break a sweat.  </p>
<p>The system boot times were comparable, but windows is usable a lot faster because all the startup programs load fairly quickly.</p>
<p>The VelociRaptor drive also lived up to its reputation for speediness, which is good since it was really expensive.</p>
<p>In the future, I&#8217;ll post some more game benchmarks as well as seeing how overclocking the new system can affect the results.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flockofcats.com/sneaky/video-games/new-computer-benchmarks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Benchmarking the Old Computer</title>
		<link>http://www.flockofcats.com/sneaky/video-games/benchmarking-the-old-computer/</link>
		<comments>http://www.flockofcats.com/sneaky/video-games/benchmarking-the-old-computer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:31:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>sneaky</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Video Games]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[benchmarking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sneaky's New Computer]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flockofcats.com/?p=463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tonight, I decided to run some benchmarks on my old computer so that I can compare the new one once I get it built.  Here are my old computer&#8217;s stats:

AMD Athlon64 3000+ (Winchester, 90 nm, 1800 MHz, 512 KB L2 cache)
Asus A8V Deluxe motherboard (Rev. 1, American Megatrends 1018.001 BIOS)
2&#215;1 GB Dual Channel OCZ [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-464 alignright" title="athlon64" src="http://www.flockofcats.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/01/athlon64.gif" alt="athlon64" width="160" height="181" />Tonight, I decided to run some benchmarks on my old computer so that I can compare the new one once I get it built.  Here are my old computer&#8217;s stats:</p>
<ul>
<li>AMD Athlon64 3000+ (Winchester, 90 nm, 1800 MHz, 512 KB L2 cache)</li>
<li>Asus A8V Deluxe motherboard (Rev. 1, American Megatrends 1018.001 BIOS)</li>
<li>2&#215;1 GB Dual Channel OCZ Platinum DDR3200 RAM</li>
<li>Radeon x850 AGP graphics card</li>
<li>75 GB system drive / 500 GB storage drive, SATA</li>
</ul>
<p>I ran tests of file compression, system boot time, image processing, Firefox load time, mp3 ripping, file copying, and 3Dmark05. Here are the results:</p>
<p><strong>File Compression</strong> &#8211; Using 7-Zip, I created an archive of a 314 MB file. This took 5 min 40 s at an average rate of about 900 KB/s.</p>
<p><strong>System Boot Time</strong> &#8211; The time it took from powering up to the windows loading screen was 39 s.  From there, it took 29 s for Windows to load to the user selection screen.  After logging it, it took 56 s for all the startup programs and processes to run.  The grand total: 2 min 4 s.</p>
<p><strong>Image Processing</strong> &#8211; To test image processing, I used the Gimp to do a Gaussian blur on a 1920&#215;1200, 172 KB JPEG image. I then scaled the original image 400% and ran the Gaussian blur filter again.  I then made a copy of the enlarged image and ran the Gaussian blur filter on the two large images simultaneously.</p>
<p>Gaussian Blur (1920&#215;1000): 7 s<br />
Scale 400%: 33 s<br />
Gaussian Blur (7680&#215;4800): 45 s<br />
Gaussian Blur x 2 (7680&#215;4800) 1 min 30 s</p>
<p>Interestingly, using the filter on two images simultaneously resulted in an exact doubling of the processing time.  The CPU was at 100% the whole time, so clearly this is a CPU-limited function.  I&#8217;ll be interested to see what the i7 chip will do for this test.</p>
<p><strong>Firefox Load Time</strong> &#8211; After rebooting, Firefox took 13 s to load for the first time following a reboot.</p>
<p><strong>MP3 Ripping</strong> &#8211; Ripping an audio CD (Uta Baka by Ken Harai, Disk 1) took 4 m 10 s using my DVD-ROM drive and 4 m 50 s using my DVD burner.  Next, I ripped the CD using the DVD-ROM drive while playing &#8220;Portal&#8221; at the same time.  This bumped the time up to 7 m 40 s.</p>
<p><strong>File Copying</strong> &#8211; Copying 2.54 GB of Battlestar Galactica Season 2 from my storage drive to my system drive took 2 m 10 s.  Then, when I made copies from the system drive to the system drive, it took 3 m 20 s.</p>
<p><strong>3Dmark05</strong> Lastly, I ran the free version of 3Dmark05.  This gave me a 3Dmark05 score of 4474 and a CPU score of 1001.</p>
<p>Once I get the new computer up and running, I&#8217;ll run these tests again using the new rig and compare the results. Since my new processor has multiple cores, I&#8217;m interested in seeing the results of the the Portal/mp3 test and the 2x image processing test.  Will the mp3&#8217;s rip just as fast as if I wasn&#8217;t playing portal? Will I be able to process the two images in roughly the same time as one?  Copying files within the system drive should speed up since I&#8217;m getting a VelociRaptor drive, though I&#8217;m curious if there will be any improvement copying from the storage drive to the system drive (if the speed of my 500 GB drive is the limiting factor, the improvement may be small).</p>
<p><strong>**Update:</strong></p>
<p><strong> Portal FPS</strong></p>
<p><span style="-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: underline; text-decoration: underline;">Normal Settings (default, 1920&#215;1200)</span><br />
Min: 37<br />
Max: 189<br />
Avg: 113<br />
<span style="-webkit-text-decorations-in-effect: underline; text-decoration: underline;">High Settings (AA: 4x, AF:4x, most other settings maxed, 1920&#215;1200)</span><br />
Min: 37<br />
Max: 157<br />
Avg: 102.66</p>
<p>This probably isn&#8217;t the best test since I only tested the very beginning of the game, and Portal isn&#8217;t the most taxing game on a system.   Also, if I set  the AA/AF above 4x, the game crashed and wouldn&#8217;t load when I restarted.  Although the results for the high settings listed above aren&#8217;t bad, at those settings, my system was totally incapable of rendering portals.  Possibly a major problem for a game called &#8220;Portal&#8221;.  The fps dropped to 1 whenever a portal came onto the screen.</p>
<p>Maybe tomorrow I&#8217;ll test another game.  In the comments, Naft recommended F.E.A.R.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.flockofcats.com/sneaky/video-games/benchmarking-the-old-computer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
